Mezzadri, Luca
(2025)
Implementing Hydrogen in Hard-to-Abate Industries: Sustainabiity Assessment of Energy Transition Pathways.
[Laurea magistrale], Università di Bologna, Corso di Studio in
Ingegneria chimica e di processo [LM-DM270], Documento full-text non disponibile
Il full-text non è disponibile per scelta dell'autore.
(
Contatta l'autore)
Abstract
The decarbonization of hard-to-abate industries represents a complex challenge due to the obvious
advantages that fossil fuels offer in these sectors. In some cases, hydrogen emerges as one
of the possible solutions, providing a viable alternative where combustion processes are needed to
generate high-temperature heat. A notable example in this regard is the ceramics industry, and in
this study, various scenarios for implementing green hydrogen were defined and analyzed in a case
study involving three ceramic companies. To this end, a procedure was developed to quantitatively
assess the feasibility and sustainability of different scenarios for replacing natural gas with green
hydrogen. After the definition and the preliminary configuration of these scenarios, a set of indicators
was calculated to evaluate the performance from multiple perspectives: technological, economic,
environmental, and safety-related. These KPIs were subsequently normalized and aggregated into a
single index to compare the various alternatives. For this purpose, several aggregation approaches
were also adopted to verify how the relative weight of the different sustainability domains influences
the final ranking. The robustness of the results was checked through a sensitivity analysis, preliminary
to a Monte Carlo analysis required to assess how uncertainties in some parameters affect the
choice of the best hydrogen implementation strategy. Finally, an attempt was made to extend the
methodology beyond the boundaries of the case study. The results of the work suggest that the
best solution strongly depends on which aspect of sustainability is prioritized and that updated and
precise parameters are necessary to obtain clear and reliable conclusions, which are usually available
in a more advanced project phase. Nonetheless, the methodology proved effective in highlighting the
main advantages and disadvantages of each decarbonization scenario.
Abstract
The decarbonization of hard-to-abate industries represents a complex challenge due to the obvious
advantages that fossil fuels offer in these sectors. In some cases, hydrogen emerges as one
of the possible solutions, providing a viable alternative where combustion processes are needed to
generate high-temperature heat. A notable example in this regard is the ceramics industry, and in
this study, various scenarios for implementing green hydrogen were defined and analyzed in a case
study involving three ceramic companies. To this end, a procedure was developed to quantitatively
assess the feasibility and sustainability of different scenarios for replacing natural gas with green
hydrogen. After the definition and the preliminary configuration of these scenarios, a set of indicators
was calculated to evaluate the performance from multiple perspectives: technological, economic,
environmental, and safety-related. These KPIs were subsequently normalized and aggregated into a
single index to compare the various alternatives. For this purpose, several aggregation approaches
were also adopted to verify how the relative weight of the different sustainability domains influences
the final ranking. The robustness of the results was checked through a sensitivity analysis, preliminary
to a Monte Carlo analysis required to assess how uncertainties in some parameters affect the
choice of the best hydrogen implementation strategy. Finally, an attempt was made to extend the
methodology beyond the boundaries of the case study. The results of the work suggest that the
best solution strongly depends on which aspect of sustainability is prioritized and that updated and
precise parameters are necessary to obtain clear and reliable conclusions, which are usually available
in a more advanced project phase. Nonetheless, the methodology proved effective in highlighting the
main advantages and disadvantages of each decarbonization scenario.
Tipologia del documento
Tesi di laurea
(Laurea magistrale)
Autore della tesi
Mezzadri, Luca
Relatore della tesi
Correlatore della tesi
Scuola
Corso di studio
Indirizzo
Sustainable technologies and biotechnologies for energy and materials
Ordinamento Cds
DM270
Parole chiave
decarbonization, Hard-to-abate industries, hydrogen, sustainability, energy transition
Data di discussione della Tesi
8 Ottobre 2025
URI
Altri metadati
Tipologia del documento
Tesi di laurea
(NON SPECIFICATO)
Autore della tesi
Mezzadri, Luca
Relatore della tesi
Correlatore della tesi
Scuola
Corso di studio
Indirizzo
Sustainable technologies and biotechnologies for energy and materials
Ordinamento Cds
DM270
Parole chiave
decarbonization, Hard-to-abate industries, hydrogen, sustainability, energy transition
Data di discussione della Tesi
8 Ottobre 2025
URI
Gestione del documento: