Wind analysis of the Messina Strait Bridge design project proposal with stabilizing cables

A new study on suspension bridges has been prompted by the big disaster of the Tacoma Narrow Bridge at half its design speed. The aerodynamic instability of long-span bridges has been studied using wind tunnel tests. As a result of improved aerodynamic performance from the geometrical configuration of the bridge deck, the aerodynamic criteria for suspension and cable-stayed bridges have become well established in recent years, thereby allowing longer bridge spans to be developed. Although the Messina Strait Bridge has yet to be constructed, we are looking forward to evaluating the impact of different deck cross-sections on both aerodynamic stability and cost reduction. To further improve the aerodynamic characteristics of long-span suspension bridges, an optimized multi-box bridge deck model with two side decks for traffic lanes, two middle railway decks, and three gaps separating them has been proposed aerodynamic performance has been experimentally verified. 1:80 scale wind tunnel tests have been conducted. According to the current MIDAS Model, the first torsional and the first vertical frequency ratios are 1.27787 and 1.36[1] respectively. It is the torsional/vertical frequency ratio, combined with the deck aerodynamic properties, that determines the wind response properties of the bridge for the most dangerous possible form of aeroelastic instability. The classic flutter is caused by the coupling of torsional and vertical modes. Stabilizing cables to the deck could be a solution to this classic flutter by reducing lateral displacement of the deck and increasing frequency ratios. Stabilizing cables will be installed on the deck in three different orientations: vertical, inclined, and horizontal, with diameters of 80 cm, 60 cm, and 40 cm in each orientation respectively. An overview of the research undertaken on this topic will be presented, as well as the most important findings.