Cirone, Cono
(2026)
Beyond LLMs: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Commonsense Reasoning in Robotics.
[Laurea magistrale], Università di Bologna, Corso di Studio in
Artificial intelligence [LM-DM270]
Documenti full-text disponibili:
![[thumbnail of Thesis]](https://amslaurea.unibo.it/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
Documento PDF (Thesis)
Disponibile con Licenza: Salvo eventuali più ampie autorizzazioni dell'autore, la tesi può essere liberamente consultata e può essere effettuato il salvataggio e la stampa di una copia per fini strettamente personali di studio, di ricerca e di insegnamento, con espresso divieto di qualunque utilizzo direttamente o indirettamente commerciale. Ogni altro diritto sul materiale è riservato
Download (1MB)
|
Abstract
Domestic robots often receive instructions that are underspecified regarding everyday actions. Large language models can interpret varied language and draw on everyday knowledge, but their reasoning is not explicitly inspectable. Symbolic systems provide transparent knowledge representation and inference, but depend on potentially incomplete rules. This thesis investigates whether combining these approaches can preserve or improve LLM performance on embodied commonsense tasks while making decisions more interpretable. Two complementary neuro-symbolic pipelines are evaluated on RoboCSKBench, a benchmark covering five embodied commonsense tasks. Pipeline 1 investigates the partially automated construction of Answer Set Programming rules for the Tidy Up and Tool Usage tasks, combining commonsense graphs, SOMA-inspired annotations, LLM-generated rule proposals, and Clingo verification. Pipeline 2 covers all five tasks: an LLM extracts controlled facts at runtime, while SWI-Prolog performs reasoning using knowledge-base evidence or hand-crafted rules. Pure-LLM and pure-logic ablations are evaluated using three Mistral model sizes, and Pipeline 2 is transferred without modification to five out-of-distribution datasets. Results show that symbolic reasoning is beneficial only under specific conditions. It is most effective when symbolic components can retrieve relevant affordance or capability knowledge and apply constraints aligned with the task’s answer format. In such cases, explicit grounding can reduce the performance gap between larger and smaller language models. Conversely, for open-ended generation or tasks whose expected decision structure is not supported by the symbolic selector, the architecture may become redundant or harmful. Overall, the findings support a conditional view of neuro-symbolic reasoning: it can improve decision traceability without necessarily sacrificing performance, provided that representation, knowledge, and inference are properly aligned.
Abstract
Domestic robots often receive instructions that are underspecified regarding everyday actions. Large language models can interpret varied language and draw on everyday knowledge, but their reasoning is not explicitly inspectable. Symbolic systems provide transparent knowledge representation and inference, but depend on potentially incomplete rules. This thesis investigates whether combining these approaches can preserve or improve LLM performance on embodied commonsense tasks while making decisions more interpretable. Two complementary neuro-symbolic pipelines are evaluated on RoboCSKBench, a benchmark covering five embodied commonsense tasks. Pipeline 1 investigates the partially automated construction of Answer Set Programming rules for the Tidy Up and Tool Usage tasks, combining commonsense graphs, SOMA-inspired annotations, LLM-generated rule proposals, and Clingo verification. Pipeline 2 covers all five tasks: an LLM extracts controlled facts at runtime, while SWI-Prolog performs reasoning using knowledge-base evidence or hand-crafted rules. Pure-LLM and pure-logic ablations are evaluated using three Mistral model sizes, and Pipeline 2 is transferred without modification to five out-of-distribution datasets. Results show that symbolic reasoning is beneficial only under specific conditions. It is most effective when symbolic components can retrieve relevant affordance or capability knowledge and apply constraints aligned with the task’s answer format. In such cases, explicit grounding can reduce the performance gap between larger and smaller language models. Conversely, for open-ended generation or tasks whose expected decision structure is not supported by the symbolic selector, the architecture may become redundant or harmful. Overall, the findings support a conditional view of neuro-symbolic reasoning: it can improve decision traceability without necessarily sacrificing performance, provided that representation, knowledge, and inference are properly aligned.
Tipologia del documento
Tesi di laurea
(Laurea magistrale)
Autore della tesi
Cirone, Cono
Relatore della tesi
Scuola
Corso di studio
Ordinamento Cds
DM270
Parole chiave
Neuro-symbolic AI, Large Language Models, Embodied Commonsense, Symbolic Reasoning, Knowledge Representation, Domestic Robots, Commonsense Reasoning
Data di discussione della Tesi
6 Ottobre 2026
URI
Altri metadati
Tipologia del documento
Tesi di laurea
(NON SPECIFICATO)
Autore della tesi
Cirone, Cono
Relatore della tesi
Scuola
Corso di studio
Ordinamento Cds
DM270
Parole chiave
Neuro-symbolic AI, Large Language Models, Embodied Commonsense, Symbolic Reasoning, Knowledge Representation, Domestic Robots, Commonsense Reasoning
Data di discussione della Tesi
6 Ottobre 2026
URI
Statistica sui download
Gestione del documento: