A comparison between vertical mixing parameterizations in the Levantine Sea

The goal of this thesis was the study of an optimal vertical mixing parameterization scheme in a mesoscale dominated field characterized from a strong vorticity and the presence of a layer of colder, less saline water at about 100 m depth (Atlantic Waters); in these conditions we compared six different experiments, that differ by the turbulent closure schemes, the presence or not of an enhanced diffusion parameterization and the presence or not of a double diffusion mixing parameterization. To evaluate the performance of the experiments and the model we compared the simulations with the ARGO observations of temperature and salinity available in our domain, in our period of interest. The conclusions were the following: • the increase of the resolution gives better results in terms of temperature in all the considered cases, and in terms of salinity. • The comparisons between the Pacanovski-Philander and the TKE turbulent closure schemes don’t show significant differences when the simulations are compared to the observations. • The removing of the enhanced diffusion parameterization in presence of the TKE turbulent closure submodel doesn’t give positive results, and show limitations in the resolving of gravitational instabilities near the surface • The k-ϵ turbulent closure model utilized in all the GLS experiments, is the best performing closure model among the three considered, with positive results in all the salinity comparison with the in situ observation and in most of the temperature comparisons. • The double mixing parameterization utilized in the k-ϵ closure submodel improves the results of the experiments improving both the temperature and salinity in comparison with the ARGO data.